Fight­ing Dir­ty Money With Enhan­ced Due Dili­gence

-

Around $2 tril­li­on in illi­cit cash flows annu­al­ly through the glo­bal finan­cial sys­tems, despi­te efforts by regu­la­tors and finan­cial insti­tu­ti­ons. To com­bat dir­ty money enhan­ced due dili­gence (EDD) is a pro­cess that invol­ves a tho­rough Know Your Cus­to­mers (KYC) which exami­nes the customer’s histo­ry as well as tran­sac­tions that car­ry hig­her risk of fraud.

EDD is con­side­red to be a hig­her scree­ning level than CDD and can also include more infor­ma­ti­on requests, such as sources and cor­po­ra­te appoint­ments, funds and asso­cia­ti­ons with com­pa­nies or indi­vi­du­als. It typi­cal­ly invol­ves more tho­rough back­ground checks, like media sear­ches, to dis­co­ver any publicly available evi­dence or evi­dence of repu­ta­tio­nal pro­of of cri­mi­na­li­ty or other mis­con­duct that could jeo­par­di­ze the bank’s ope­ra­ti­ons.

Regu­la­to­ry bodies have gui­de­lines on when EDD should be trig­ge­red. It is typi­cal­ly based upon the natu­re of the tran­sac­tion or cus­to­mer, as well as whe­ther the per­son con­cer­ned is poli­ti­cal­ly expo­sed (PEP). But ulti­m­ate­ly, it’s up to each FI to take a sub­jec­ti­ve judgment on what trig­gers EDD on top of CDD.

It is important to estab­lish poli­ci­es that cle­ar­ly explain to employees what EDD expects and what it will not. This will allow you to avo­id high-risk sce­na­ri­os that can result in sub­stan­ti­al fines for fraud. It is essen­ti­al to have an iden­ti­ty veri­fi­ca­ti­on pro­cess in place that allows you to iden­ti­fy red flags, such as hid­den IP addres­ses, spoo­fing tech­ni­ques and fic­ti­tious iden­ti­fiers.

his expl­ana­ti­on of Board Soft­ware Pri­cing Break­down

Category:
Comments (0)

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert