Asi­an Rela­ti­onship Valua­tions


Asi­an rela­ti­onship ide­als are the phi­lo­so­phy and prac­ti­ces that most Cook­wa­re women main­tain in their inter­ac­tions. The­se include a fan­ta­stic empha­sis on fami­ly and trust­wort­hi­ness to your par­ti­cu­lar par­ents; a sen­se of per­so­nal tri­bu­te that for­bids beha­vi­or that could dis­grace the fami­ly; a stoic atti­tu­de toward having dif­fi­cul­ties and dise­a­se; and an empha­sis on aca­de­mics and tech­no­lo­gi­cal qua­li­ty.

The con­cept of Asi­an prin­ci­ples aro­se in the ear­ly 1990’s, when it was pro­mo­ted by poli­ti­cal shapes such as Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew and Malaysia’s Mahat­hir Moha­mad. The­se poli­ti­cal figu­res hoped to tell apart them­sel­ves via Wes­tern cri­tics with their human legal rights reports and from pres­su­re to spread out their pro­tec­ted eco­no­mies to imports and for­eign invest­ment. Addi­tio­nal­ly , the noti­on of Asi­an values ser­ved as a con­ve­ni­ent means for the­se govern­ments to jus­ti­fy their reluc­tance to expand poli­ti­cal par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on.

The cla­im that Cook­wa­re values con­sti­tu­te a powerful coun­ter­weight to glo­bal trends toward indi­vi­dua­lism, demo­cra­cy, and capi­ta­lism is debata­ble for many fac­tors. First, this igno­res the ext­ent to which the­se social trends are shaped by sim­ply cul­tu­ral con­text. For exam­p­le , the con­cept of a free of char­ge indi­vi­du­al becau­se the basis of most rights and duties is uni­que to the tole­ran­te West, and it has sim­ply no coun­ter­part in Asia, whe­re peo­p­le are made into a world encum­be­red by a com­plex array of requi­re­ments to popu­la­ti­on at lar­ge.

The­se Asi­an-style obli­ga­ti­ons in front of lar­ge audi­en­ces affect Asi­ans’ atti­tu­des toward work, edu­ca­ti­on, and social con­cerns in gene­ral. Addi­tio­nal­ly they affect the ways in which they rela­te to their fami­lies, fri­ends, and fri­ends and neigh­bors. They impact, for ins­tance, their edu­ca­ti­on to which Asi­ans seek out sup­port in times of trou­ble and the reluc­tance to ack­now­ledge strong emo­ti­ons such as grief or per­haps pain. This stoi­cism may crea­te issues in health-rela­ted set­tings, whe­re­ver wes­tern medi­cal experts often find it dif­fi­cult to app­re­cia­te a person’s refu­sal to express distres­sing emo­ti­ons.

Comments (0)

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert